GENEALOGI PAHAM RADIKAL: ANALISIS HISTORIS TERHADAP PERKEMBANGAN IDEOLOGI RADIKAL ABAD KE-20
Abstract
This study examines the genealogy of radical ideology in the 20th century, focusing on its development, changes in radical thinking, and the factors that influenced its evolution. In a century full of conflict, revolution, and global change, radical ideologies such as communism and fascism played a central role in shaping social and political order. This study explores the genealogy of radical ideology, including its peak period, when communism and fascism emerged as dominant ideologies. We also reveal changes in radical thinking throughout the 20th century, including the adaptation of these ideologies to historical events and social changes. In addition, this study analyzes the social, political, economic, and technological factors that influenced the development of radical thinking. The results of this study have important implications for understanding the history and socio-political dynamics of the 20th century. In addition, this study is relevant to addressing the challenges of radicalism in the contemporary era by providing insights into the development of radical ideology in the future. This study contributes to the study of ideology, history, and global politics. It can serve as an important reference source for researchers, academics, and policymakers interested in understanding radical ideology and its dynamics of development
References
Bennett, N. (2017). Emma Goldman and the Autobiography of the People. American Political Thought, 6(1), 54–77.
Carvalho, J.-P., & Sacks, M. (2024). Radicalisation. The Economic Journal, 134(659), 1019–1068. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/uead094
Cherry, M.-A., & Schumann, S. (2025). The Role of Emotions in the Radicalization Process. In The Sociology of Violent Extremism (pp. 73–92). Oxford University PressNew York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780197690161.003.0005
Cottee, S. (2024). Radicalization Discourse: Consensus Points, Evidence Base and Blind Spots. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2024.2361942
Elkins, K. (2025). Beyond Plot: How Sentiment Analysis Reshapes Our Understanding of Narrative Structure. Journal of Cultural Analytics, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.22148/001c.143671
Faizin, K. (2018). Fundamentalisme dan Gerakan Radikal Islam Kontemporer di Indonesia (Menelisik Genealogi, Ideologi, dan Target Gerakan). Refleksi, 14(2), 165–188. https://doi.org/10.15408/ref.v14i2.10175
Ghifari, I. F. (2017). Radikalisme di Internet. Religious: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama Dan Lintas Budaya, 1(2), 123. https://doi.org/10.15575/rjsalb.v1i2.1391
Hafid, W. (2020). Geneologi Radikalisme Di Indonesia (Melacak Akar Sejarah Gerakan Radikal). Al-Tafaqquh: Journal of Islamic Law, 1(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.33096/altafaqquh.v1i1.37
Maskaliūnaitė, A. (2015). Exploring the Theories of Radicalization. International Studies. Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal, 17(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1515/ipcj-2015-0002
Nandwani, P., & Verma, R. (2021). A review on sentiment analysis and emotion detection from text. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 11(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-021-00776-6
Rustandi, A. M., Suryadi, K., & Anggraeni, L. (2022). Analysis of Radicalism Critical Discourse in Facebook Social Media. JURNAL CIVICUS, 21(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.17509/civicus.v21i1.45595
Rustina, R., & M. Hidayat. (2023). PERSEPSI MAHASISWA TINGKAT AKHIR DI UIN DATOKARAMA PALU DALAM MEMAHAMI KEDUDUKAN TEORI PADA PENELITIAN KUALITATIF. Idaarah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 7(2), 305–315. https://doi.org/10.24252/idaarah.v7i2.41456
Sarmadan, S., Rahmat, A., & Attas, S. G. (2022). DISCOURSE OF HIZBUT TAHRIR INDONESIA’S RADICALISM: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS ON TEMPO.CO MEDIA. Getsempena English Education Journal, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.46244/geej.v9i1.1775
Soetomo, G. (2020). Radikalisme di Indonesia: Sejarah Rekonstruksi dan Dekonstruksi. JURNAL INDO-ISLAMIKA, 6(1), 108–138. https://doi.org/10.15408/idi.v6i1.14798
Torok, R. (2013). Developing an explanatory model for the process of online radicalisation and terrorism. Security Informatics, 2(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/2190-8532-2-6
Wolfowicz, M., Litmanovitz, Y., Weisburd, D., & Hasisi, B. (2021). Cognitive and behavioral radicalization: A systematic review of the putative risk and protective factors. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1174
Yazan, B. (2015). Three Approaches to Case Study Methods in Education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2102
York, M. (2021). Building a Culture of Revolutionary Love: The Politics of Love in Radical Social Transformation. In International Handbook of Love (pp. 177–191). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45996-3_10
Copyright (c) 2025 Risalatul Muawana Khoirul, Aida Zakhrimatul Umami Almaidatul, Rifallah Haikal Akbar, Winarto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
