Phubbing Behaviour and Information Discernment among Students of the State Islamic University of North Sumatra

  • Liza Octaviana State Islamic University of North Sumatra, Indonesia
  • Franindya Purwaningtyas State Islamic University of North Sumatra, Indonesia
Keywords: Phubbing, Information Discernment, Information Behaviour, Students

Abstract

With the rise of smartphone use, phubbing is becoming more prevalent in college settings. This illness is thought to impact not only social interaction, but also the ability to distinguish information, or to evaluate the credibility of the information. This study aims to find out the phubbing behaviour on the ability to discern information for students of State Islamic University of North Sumatra and to find out what efforts students do to maintain the quality of information evaluation. The study used a descriptive qualitative method with purposive sampling and included six students who exhibited phubbing behaviour. An interactive analytic model was used to analyse the data that were gathered through observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation. According to the study's findings, nomophobia, interpersonal conflict, self-isolation, and problem acknowledgement are the four dimensions through which phubbing behaviour arises. Through attention disturbance, decreased learning engagement, and a propensity to analyse material superficially, these four characteristics impact the process of receiving knowledge. However, some students continue to make an effort to uphold information discernment by checking information with instructors or peers, going over course materials, and limiting smartphone use according to a priority scale. These results suggest that phubbing increases susceptibility to the deterioration in the quality of information evaluation rather than directly eliminating the capacity for information discernment. Therefore, in order to help students' capacity to critically analyse information, self-regulation, digital distraction management, and information literacy must be strengthened.

Abstrak

Perilaku phubbing semakin sering ditemukan di lingkungan perguruan tinggi seiring meningkatnya intensitas penggunaan smartphone. Kondisi ini tidak hanya memengaruhi interaksi sosial, tetapi juga diduga berdampak pada information discernment, yaitu kemampuan mengevaluasi kredibilitas informasi secara kritis. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis perilaku phubbing terhadap information discernment mahasiswa Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara serta mengidentifikasi upaya yang dilakukan mahasiswa untuk mempertahankan kualitas penilaian informasi. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif dengan teknik purposive sampling terhadap enam mahasiswa yang memenuhi kriteria perilaku phubbing. Data dikumpulkan melalui observasi, wawancara mendalam, dan dokumentasi, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan model analisis interaktif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perilaku phubbing muncul melalui empat dimensi, yaitu nomophobia, interpersonal conflict, self-isolation, dan problem acknowledgement. Keempat dimensi tersebut memengaruhi proses penerimaan informasi melalui gangguan perhatian, berkurangnya keterlibatan dalam pembelajaran, serta kecenderungan melakukan evaluasi informasi secara dangkal. Meskipun demikian, sebagian mahasiswa tetap berupaya mempertahankan information discernment dengan memverifikasi informasi kepada dosen maupun teman, meninjau kembali materi pembelajaran, serta mengendalikan penggunaan smartphone berdasarkan skala prioritas. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa phubbing tidak secara langsung menghilangkan kemampuan information discernment, tetapi meningkatkan kerentanan terhadap menurunnya kualitas evaluasi informasi. Oleh karena itu, penguatan regulasi diri, pengelolaan distraksi digital, dan literasi informasi diperlukan untuk mendukung kemampuan mahasiswa mengevaluasi informasi secara kritis.

References

Aditia, R. (2021). Fenomena Phubbing: Suatu Degradasi Relasi Sosial Sebagai Dampak Media Sosial. KELUWIH: Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 2(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.24123/soshum.v2i1.4034

APJII. (2025). Survei Penetrasi Internet dan Perilaku Penggunaan Internet Indonesia 2025. Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia, 133. https://survei.apjii.or.id/

Beene, S., Greer, K., & Smith, M. D. (2023). Evaluation of social media information among college students: An information literacy approach using CCOW. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(5), 102767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102771

Beukeboom, C. J., & Pollmann, M. M. H. (2021). Partner phubbing: Why using your phone during interactions with your partner can be detrimental for your relationship. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, 106932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106932

Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). Measuring phone snubbing behavior: Development and validation of the Generic Scale of Phubbing (GSP) and the Generic Scale of Being Phubbed (GSBP). Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.020

Chyne, R. C., Khongtim, J., & Wann, T. (2023). Evaluation of social media information among college students: An information literacy approach using CCOW. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(5), 102771

CILIP. (2018). Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (CILIP). Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, Fourth Edition. https://doi.org/10.1081/e-elis4-120030201

Fatchurahman, M., Setiawan, M. A., & Karyanti, K. (2023). Intervention group logotherapy and performance measures for reducing phubbing in Generation Z. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 40, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0275202340e200244

Hassoun, A., Beacock, I., Carmody, T., Kelley, P. G., Goldberg, B., Kumar, D., Murray, L., Park, R. S., Sarmadi, B., & Consolvo, S. (2025). Beyond Digital Literacy: Building Youth Digital Resilience Through Existing “Information Sensibility” Practices. Social Sciences, 14(4), 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14040230

Smith, E. E., & Storrs, H. (2023). Digital literacies, social media, and undergraduate learning: What do students think they need to know? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(29). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00398-2

Kitchen, Philip J., Kerr, G., Schultz, D., McColl, R., & Pals, H. (2014). The elaboration likelihood model: Review, critique and research agenda. European Journal of Marketing, 48(11/12), 2033–2050. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-12-2011-0776

Klepsch, M., Schmitz, F., & Seufert, T. (2017). Development and validation of two instruments measuring intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1997. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01997

Lutfiana, N., & Arviani, H. (2024). Dawatuna: Journal of Communication and Islamic Broadcasting Dawatuna : Journal of Communication and Islamic Broadcasting. 3, 1722–1735. https://doi.org/10.47476/dawatuna.v3i4.453

McGrew, S. (2020). Learning to evaluate: An intervention in civic online reasoning. Computers & Education, 146, 103711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103711

McGrew, S., & Breakstone, J. (2023). Civic Online Reasoning Across the Curriculum: Developing and Testing the Efficacy of Digital Literacy Lessons. AERA Open, 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584231176451

Merriam-Webster. (2012). Phubbing An invented word that might be too useful to ignore. https://www.merriam-webster.com/wordplay/phubbing-words-we’re-watching

Nguyen, M. H., Hargittai, E., & Marler, W. (2021). Digital inequality in communication during a time of physical distancing: The case of COVID-19. Computers in Human Behavior, 120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106717

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion.

Pérez-Juárez, M. Á., González-Ortega, D., & Aguiar-Pérez, J. M. (2023). Digital Distractions from the Point of View of Higher Education Students. Sustainability, 15(7), 6044. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076044

Pointon, M., Walton, G., Turner, M., Lackenby, M., Barker, J., & Wilkinson, A. (2023). Information discernment and online reading behaviour: an experiment. In Online Information Review (Vol. 47, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-02-2021-0101

Putri, U. L. N., Pratitis, N. T., & Arifiana, I. Y. (2024). Phone snubbing pada dewasa awal: Bagaimana peranan kontrol diri? Pendahuluan. 3(4), 571–585.

Saienko, V., Kurysh, N., & Siliutina, I. (2022). Digital Competence of Higher Education Applicants: New Opportunities and Challenges for Future Education. Futurity Education, 2(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED/2022.10.11.23

Salsabila, M. D., Sartika, D. D., Hendarso, Y., & Sriwijaya, U. (2024). Relasi Sosial Pada Pelaku Phone Snubbing (Phubbing) Mahasiswa Universitas Sriwijaya Di Kota Palembang. 7, 236–251. https://doi.org/10.37329/ganaya.v7i1.2195

Sandrin Hura, M., Wahyu Sitasari, N., & Asmi Rozali, Y. (2021). Pengaruh Fear of Missing Out Terhadap Perilaku Phubbing Pada Remaja. Jurnal Psikologi : Media Ilmiah Psikologi, 19(2), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.47007/jpsi.v19i2.191

Walton, G. (2017). Journal of Information Literacy Information literacy is a subversive activity : developing a research-based theory of information discernment. 11(1).

Walton, G., Pickard, A. J., & Dodd, L. (2018). Information discernment, mis-information and pro-active scepticism. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 50(3), 296–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000618769980

Wilson, T. D. (1999). Models in information behaviour research. Journal of Documentation, 55(3), 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007145

Wilson, T. D. (2000). Human information behavior. Informing Science, 3(2), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.28945/576

Published
2026-08-16
How to Cite
Octaviana, L., & Purwaningtyas, F. (2026). Phubbing Behaviour and Information Discernment among Students of the State Islamic University of North Sumatra. Inkunabula: Journal of Library Science and Islamic Information, 5(2), 155-170. https://doi.org/10.24239/inkunabula.v5i2.5634
Section
Articles