MELAWAN TEORI OTENTISITAS HADITS
(Counter Discourse Nabia Abbot Terhadap Teori Ignaz Goldziher)
Abstract
In the scientific tradition, the study of Islam in the orientalisme is not stagnant, but has experienced development. This article focuses on the arguments of Nabia Abbot's argument and theory in refuting Goldziher's theory of the study of hadith. The author calls it a counter discourse. At least this article found three outlines of Nabia Abbot's rebuttal to Goldziher: (a) the theory of authenticity, Goldziher said the hadith was not an authentic report but a form of doctrinal reflection during the first two centuries after the prophet Muhammad. Abbot denies he views this view as wrong because it ignores historical evidence. For Abbot the hadith had appeared early in the century, as evidenced by the oral hadith of Muawwiyah (d. 60/680), Marwan (d. 65/684) and Abd Malik bin Marwan (d. 86/705). (b) Isnad's theory. Goldziher mentioned that the growth of the hadith in the third century Hijriyah was due to the history of history and the fabrication of the hadith. Nabia Abbott has argued with the argument that the number of hadiths is due to the growth of the hadith path in the geometric progression, not forgery. (c) Hadith Writing Theory, Goldziher said that the early hadith did not have a written reference, only oral, so the hadith in the form of thoughts could not be verified. Abbot denied, he said, that the beginning had been carried out in the narration and the modification of the hadith. Besides there are a number of books of hadith as in the text of Hammâm b. Munabbih (40-131 / 132 H).
References
____________ Studies in Arabic Literary Papyri II; Qur’anic Commentary and Tradition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1967.
Amin, Komaruddin, Menguji Kembali Keakuratan Metode Kritik Hadist. Jakarta: Mizan Publika, 2009.
Akifahadi, Labib Syauqi, Tanggapan Sarjana Muslim Terhadap Kajian Hadis Orentalis, dalam www.anti-islamlib.com,
al-Badawī, Hasan Abdul Rauf dan Abdurrahman Ghirrah, Orientalisme dan Misionarisme (Menelikung pola Pikir Umat Islam), terj. Andi Subarkah Bandung : PT Remaja Posdakarya, 2007.
Berg, Herbert. The Development of Exegesis In Early Islam; The Autenticity Of Muslim Literature From The Formative Periode, Surrey: Curzon Press Richmond, 2000
Falahi, Ghulam Nabi, “Development of hadith A Concise Introduction of early Hadith Literature” dalam www.ukim.org/dakwah/The%20Hadith.pdf.
Ghurab, Ahmad Abdul Hamid, Menyingkap Tabir Orientalisme, terj. Basalamah, Jakarta : Pustaka al-Kautsar, 1992.
Goldziher, Ignaz, Muslim Studies. London:George Alen and Unwin Ltd, 1970.
Ibn Salah, Taqiyuddin Abu ‘Amru al-Syahruzury, Muqadimah Ibn Salah wa Mahasin alIstilah, Tahkik ‘Aisah Abdurrahman Bintu Syati’, Kairo, Dar al-Ma’arif, 1989.
Jamilah, Maryam, Islam dan Orientalisme: sebuah kajian analitik. terj. Mahnud Husein, Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 1997.
al-Khatib, ‘Abd al-karim Yunus al-Khatib dkk. Membendung sikap anti Islam. Terj. Shobah al-Shudur. Jakarta : Pustaka mantiq, 1992.
Masrur. Ali "Nabia Abbott (1897-1981) tentang Pertumbuhan Isnâd dan Periwayatan Hadis Secara Tertulis", dalam Jurnal Wawasan Fakultas Ushuluddin UIN Bandung Vo. 33, No. 1 Januari-Juni 2010.
Minhaji, Akh. Islamic Law and Local Tradition ; A Socio-Historical Approach Yogyakarta, Kurnia Kalam semesta, 2008
al-Samuray, Qasim, Bukti – bukti Kebohongan orientalis. Jakarta : Gema Insani Press. 1996.
Schacht, Josep, The Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence: Tentang Asal-Usul Hukum Islam dan Masalah Otentisitas Sunah terj. Joko Supomo. Yogyakarta: Insan Madani, 2010.
Shobroh, ‘Afāf, al-Musytasyriqūn, Musykilāt al-hadhārah . Kairo: Dār al-Nahdhah al-‘Arabiyyah, 1985.
Syahrur, Muhammad. Sunnah ar-Rasu>liyah wa Sunnah an-Nabawiyah, Bairut: Dar al-Saq, 2012
al-Syiba’ī, Mustofa Hassan, Membongkar Kepalsuan orientalisme. Terj. Ibn Burdah. Yogyakarta : Mitra Pustaka. 1997
Umar, Muin, Orientalisme dan Studi tentang islam, Jakarta : Bulan Bintang, 1978..
