Comparison of International Humanitarian Law And Islamic Law In The Use of Weapons At Sea And On Land

Abstract

This lawful examination intends to dissect the adequacy of limitations on the utilization of weapons in struggle in the sea by looking at two legitimate points of view to be specific Worldwide Philanthropic Regulation and Islamic Conflict Regulation. The composing technique utilized in this lawful exploration is prescriptive doctrinal or standardizing with a near way to deal with regulation, verifiable methodology and calculated approach. Wellsprings of legitimate materials utilized by specialists are essential and optional legitimate materials.

 The consequences of this legitimate examination show that: To start with, the ongoing furnished struggle, particularly in the ocean region, is at this point not ready to safeguard the two warriors and noncombatants in light of the fast improvement of metallurgical and military regulation so casualties experience inordinate and gigantic wounds. Furthermore, despite the fact that Islamic conflict regulations have not been refreshed for quite a while and are focused on land fighting, the components of insurance and limitations on the utilization of their weapons are powerful and are still exceptionally important for use in both land and ocean clashes.